近日，ETS官網(wǎng)發(fā)布了一篇名為托福成績對比的文章，同時發(fā)布了一個成績對比的小工具，用戶只需在小框中輸入托福的分數(shù)，標尺上就會自動檢索到與之對應的雅思分數(shù)。這份調(diào)查的數(shù)據(jù)樣本基于1153位既參加了托福又參加了雅思考試的考生成績，但是具體情況也存在因人而異，僅可作為參考。意在幫助同學們選擇更適合自己的留學考試。

　　如圖所示：雅思7.5對應的托福成績是102-109;雅思8分對應托福110-114;

　　ETS官方收集了1153名同時參加過托福和雅思考試的考生成績數(shù)據(jù)，并研制出托福雅思分數(shù)轉(zhuǎn)化器，水平方向移動下方圖示中的藍色尺標即可獲取托福分數(shù)(0-120分)，所對應的雅思分數(shù)(0-9分)。注：大部分的1153名研究對象在托福和雅思兩項考試中皆拿到了中等及中等偏上的分數(shù)。

　　海都出國留學顧問 廈門大學GETS 福州分中心鄧老師提醒同學們，在申請海外高校的時候可以參考ETS官方給出的托福雅思分數(shù)換算表，指導自己的海外院校選擇及留學申請規(guī)劃。

　　>>>托福雅思分數(shù)轉(zhuǎn)換器<<<

　　托福與雅思分數(shù)轉(zhuǎn)化表

　　托福閱讀及雅思閱讀分數(shù)轉(zhuǎn)化表

　　托福聽力及雅思聽力分數(shù)轉(zhuǎn)化表

　　托?？谡Z及雅思口語分數(shù)轉(zhuǎn)化表

　　托福寫作及雅思寫作分數(shù)轉(zhuǎn)化表

　　對應的原文部分如下：

　　As the maker of the TOEFL® test, ETS aims to give you the information you need to make the best admissions decisions for your institution. That's why we've conducted research to develop these helpful tools that make it easier for you to compare TOEFL iBT® scores to the IELTS® academic module and the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR).

　　TOEFL iBT® and IELTS® Academic Module Scores

　　Score Comparison Tool

　　Drag the slider to the TOEFL iBT Total Score (or enter it in the box below) to see the IELTS Overall Band Score.

　　Overview

　　ETS developed the score comparison tool to help score users make educated admissions decisions by allowing them to compare TOEFL iBT scores to IELTS Band Scores. The data is based on the analysis of 1,153 individuals who took both the TOEFL test and the IELTS academic test.

　　Comparison Tables

　　Based on the research reports that link TOEFL iBT scores to IELTS scores, ETS developed these comparison tables to help you make informed admissions decisions.

　　ETS does not endorse using the tables to calculate cut scores. Institutions wishing to set cut scores should study the two tests and work with test results to set cut scores that are appropriate to meet their specific needs.

　　*Indicates score comparison ranges with the highest degree of confidence. The data is based on the analysis of 1,153 individuals who took both the TOEFL test and the IELTS academic module.

　　Research

　　Linking TOEFL iBT Scores to IELTS® Scores — A Research Report (PDF)

　　ETS conducted score comparison research between the TOEFL test and an alternative test, IELTS academic. For the research, ETS obtained a sample of 1,153 students who had both IELTS and TOEFL scores. Under this approach, TOEFL iBT score ranges are identified for test takers meeting a particular score level on the equivalent IELTS score band. The score comparison results for each section (Listening, Speaking, Reading and Writing) and for the total test showed that most of the students in the sample scored in the middle to mid-high score ranges on both tests.

　　TOEFL iBT Scores and the CEFR

　　In 2006, as the TOEFL iBT test was being introduced, ETS conducted a standard-setting exercise with educators to map the new scores to the CEFR levels.

　　Since the time of that study, ETS has been closely monitoring the needs of TOEFL iBT score users and how they make use of CEFR levels and TOEFL iBT cut scores to inform their policies and decisions. ETS has also received extensive feedback from universities and teachers of English about the levels of performance in an academic setting represented by different CEFR levels and TOEFL score levels.

　　Based on this feedback from the field, ETS has adjusted the TOEFL scores corresponding to different CEFR levels, so that the scores more closely reflect performance described in the CEFR levels.

　　ETS adjusted TOEFL iBT scores using the test's Standard Error of Measurement (SEM). An SEM is found in every test, and quantifies the reliability of test scores — that is, the extent to which test takers would earn the same test score if they took different versions of the test on different occasions. Using commonly accepted educational measurement practice, ETS adjusted the TOEFL score requirements by two SEMs.

　　Comparison Table

　　Below are the adjusted TOEFL iBT scores mapped to their corresponding CEFR levels.